EVIDENCE · METHODS
Make the limits visible.
Different evidence sources answer different questions. This register explains how the study keeps them separate.
One sample. Different eligible populations.
Base records
433 Airtel / 513 Jio
Support users
271 Airtel / 328 Jio
Failure reporters
240 Airtel / 280 Jio
Support N–R questions require support contact; failure and recovery U–Z measures require a significant failure. Populated answers outside those populations remain in the source workbook but do not enter those analyses. Multi-select proportions use respondents, so totals may exceed 100%.
Ordinal questions, explicit methods.
Descriptive results
Counts, 1–5 distributions, median and all modes are primary. Means, sample standard deviation and sample variance are additional summaries.
Provider comparisons
Two-sided Mann–Whitney U, tie/continuity correction and Cliff’s delta. Positive differences mean Airtel higher. Inference requires 20 eligible records per provider and nonconstant pooled ratings.
Uncertainty and multiplicity
95% percentile intervals use 2,000 respondent resamples within provider. Holm correction uses the family of five primary proxies. Arbitrary filtered exploration remains exploratory.
Associations
Spearman correlation uses pairwise eligibility and 4,999 deterministic permutations. Chi-square/Cramér’s V requires expected cell counts of at least 5.
A nonsignificant difference does not establish equivalence. Statistical association does not establish cause. No population weights or representative-sample claims are used.
Why there is no overall SERVQUAL score.
No paired expectation questions are present. Physical tangibles were not measured; the digital-experience item is a limited proxy. The candidate reliability group has α = 0.474 and the support-eligible responsiveness group α = 0.401. These weak internal-consistency diagnostics support an item-first analysis.
Inspect scale diagnosticsThe discrepancy register.
| Source issue | Decision |
|---|---|
| Slide 8/9 survey overlays conflict with editable network/framework content | Survey and independent network evidence remain separate. |
| Slide empathy: 3.22 / 3.25 | Does not reproduce. All-row R means: 3.420 / 3.415. Support-eligible means: 3.450 / 3.424. |
| TRAI broadband denominator | Label wired + wireless, including M2M; not unique people or households. |
| Reliability Experience scale | 100–1000 points, not 0–1000. |
| 426 incident placeholders and repeated text | Exclude placeholders from incident NLP; expose repeated-text sensitivity. |
| “Call drop Billing” | Preserve the ambiguous compound category; do not invent a split. |
| Jio AirFiber versus national FWA counts | Withhold cross-source comparison until definitions reconcile. |
| Original PowerPoint absent | All 15 experiences follow the supplied Markdown reconstruction. |
Text is evidence, with context.
Incident, best-aspect and improvement prompts are analysed separately. VADER labels are automated estimates. A frozen 120-response semantic review assesses sentiment and themes; model-assisted review is not independent human validation. Aggregate sentiment requires macro-F1 ≥ 0.75. The Text Explorer reports the actual result.
Original identifiers are omitted from the web data. Text is scanned for identifying information before export. No raw workbook, customer names or email fields are bundled.
Open the Text Explorer